If geeks love it, we’re on it

Nutty geek learns Facebook doesn’t take kindly to Google+

Nutty geek learns Facebook doesn’t take kindly to Google+

As the days pass, people are flocking to check out Google+’s new spin on social networking. While it’s too early to tell just how much Google+ and its Circles feature will impact Facebook, it’s quite apparent that the social networking giant isn’t taking too kindly to its newest rival.

Michael's ad as seen on Facebook.

Meet internet geek Michael Lee Johnson, an app developer and self-proclaimed “Technological Virtuoso”. Armed with his new Google+ account, he made it his goal to rapidly grow his new network—but how? Inspiration hit Michael, and he created a series of ads to be placed on Facebook, the first of which was simply headlined “Add Michael to Google+”.

Shortly after the ad’s debut, Facebook responded in a classic kneejerk reaction: disabling Michael’s account and putting the kibosh to his entire campaign. They also sent him a conveniently vague letter, which Michael shared in his Google+ posts:

Your account has been disabled. All of your adverts have been stopped and should not be run again on the site under any circumstances. Generally, we disable an account if too many of its adverts violate our Terms of Use or Advertising guidelines. Unfortunately we cannot provide you with the specific violations that have been deemed abusive. Please review our Terms of Use and Advertising guidelines if you have any further questions.

Since the ads were pulled, Michael has garnered at least 1,460 new followers from the ordeal. Many of them came after reading CNET blogger Chris Matyszczyk, who ran an article recently that looked into what “specific violation” Michael could have crossed.

Satire flows from Michael's Google+ page.

Meanwhile, Michael continues to post in his Google+ page with images and comments that poke fun at Facebook’s reaction, such as “the best thing I ever did was delete my Facebook account. Now I’ve got more time to use Google+”. The original post about the ad’s removal earned over 400 comments and cresting 1,000 shares, with subsequent posts still getting decent amounts of attention.

My take on it: it’s more than clear that poor little Zuckerberg and his crew have felt that their collective toes have been stepped on. While it’s understandable for Facebook to dislike running ads that direct traffic to a competitor, it makes it look like they view Google+ as a threat when the go so far as disabling someone’s account.

Comments

  1. Cliff_Forster
    Cliff_Forster I look at Google+ as an opportunity to start fresh, learning from past social networking mistakes. Still, I'd say Facebook has very little to worry about. Google to date has had as many resounding failures in services as they have successes. They have allot to prove here, and so far, while I think its a nice social integration to my gmail, I don't see anything particularly innovative..... yet.....
  2. Kwitko
    Kwitko And what has Facebook done that is innovative? Nothing, really. Maybe their timing was good. The friend system sucks on FB. Google has circles. Chat sucks on FB. Google has hangouts. Security is horrendous on FB. Google has granular security control. FB integration with other sites is intrusive at worst, not noticeable at best. Google tightly integrates with their other services. Finally, FB has FarmVille. Google- thankfully- doesn't have games. Hopefully it will stay that way, or if they do bring on Zynga, at least you can contain the notifications to your Gaming circle.

    Nothing wrong with failure. It's one more step closer to success.
  3. Cliff_Forster
    Cliff_Forster We definitely agree on this, the security on Facebook is appalling and Google has a huge opportunity to differentiate themselves in that regard.

    I'm also with you on the games notifications too, I'm a little worn out with that on FB, takes some management to weed it out. It's done as a promotional tactic, we understand that, but we don't want it.

    I'm not knocking what Google has done thus far, I'm just saying, from a business and mind-share perspective, I don't think the execs at Facebook are loosing too much sleep yet. Let's face it, at it's core social networking is about connecting with people, and both platforms allow you to do that. People are so rooted in facebook, it will take a major shift for people to delete their accounts. The audience is dug in allot deeper than when friendster and MySpace lost share. Then again, this is Google, and they can basically keep at it until they get it right.

    Either way, this is going to be interesting to watch.
  4. Bandrik
    Bandrik Excellent points so far. I too am fed up with Facebook's built-in design to allow gamers to spam every little achievement. That, and pretty much everything else that Kwitko pointed out is why I'll probably enjoy Google+ more than Facebook. It's all very transparent and in front of you.

    Besides all the Google integration goodness, my favorite part about Google+ is the circles. Some are turned off by the added complexity of making a decision every time you post something ("who should I share this with...?") but I really like it. This way, I pretty much have full control over what I say and who can see it. For example, I should be able to talk about crazy Icrontic parties without those in my "co-workers" circle ever finding out--assuming I remember to select the option, haha. I'm sure many will screw that up and get some major grief.
  5. Garg
    Garg It's definitely safer than having to remember to change from a default visibility level like in FB (especially since mobile apps don't give that option). Hopefully they keep it that way, or at least keep it as an option.
  6. Starman
    Starman My biggest complaint with Facebook is the increasing number of "opt-out" changes. The big one was the change that hid a lot of my friends from my feed because I didn't post on their walls a lot. I didn't realize how many people I stopped seeing because of that change; I thought they had just gotten quiet. Then I read a post elsewhere about it and discovered that those people were still active, but Facebook hid them from me by default. Changes like that should never be default.
  7. Jingalls
    Jingalls I'm with Bandrik about the app spam. I checked the other day, and I have blocked, individually, 800 different applications because of newsfeed spam. I have also hidden around 20 serial offenders (people), which probably keeps the number of new applications I block down.
  8. Gate28
    Gate28 I'd probably drop Facebook in favor of Google+ if I could change the email my G+ is tied to my not @gmail.com account, since I dont use the GMail account anymore.
  9. Snarkasm
    Snarkasm You can always forward your GMail to another account.
  10. Gate28
    Gate28 I could, but I ditched it because its flooded with spam.
  11. one234h
    one234h FB has been everything wrong with the status quo for a while, (and lots of other things).

    But it's the fact that it smacks with corporate stagnation that irritates me the most.
  12. one234h
    one234h http://giveupinternet.com/2011/07/25/i-heard-you-like-facebook-chat-comic/

    One critique about Google+ is that when I add someone, I create a circle and add them to an Everyone one.

    There is always a lag in the creation of the circle and I have to refresh the page once or twice till I can click on that stream.

    Also the words Stream and Circle seem redundant.

    Also, FB feels like a possessive boyfriend that own't let me leave. He won't let me get access to my Friends.
  13. Thrax
    Thrax I don't have that lag.
  14. one234h
    one234h
    Thrax wrote:
    I don't have that lag.



    okay_guy_face_poster-p228648734282997276trma_400.jpg

    Okay.
  15. Bandrik
    Bandrik Brilliant use of Okay Guy Face. :D

    Er, I mean, =(

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!